The truth about Trauma Bonding.

Trauma encoded dependency is the term Daniel Ryan Cotler uses in Voiceless No More: The Legal War on Narcissistic Abuse to explain why survivors remain attached to people who are harming them and why separation often feels physically unbearable rather than emotionally difficult.

Click to purchase voiceless no more

This dependency is not emotional weakness or poor boundaries. It is a neurological conditioning process created through repeated cycles of threat and relief. When fear, abandonment, punishment, or humiliation are paired with intermittent moments of care or calm, the brain begins to associate the abuser with survival itself.

Under these conditions, the nervous system does not encode attachment as choice. It encodes it as regulation. The abuser becomes the perceived source of safety from the very harm they are causing. That paradox is not psychological confusion. It is trauma learning.

Over time, stress hormones such as cortisol and adrenaline remain chronically elevated. Moments of relief trigger dopamine and oxytocin surges. The brain learns that compliance, closeness, or self abandonment temporarily reduce pain. This creates a feedback loop where dependency is biologically reinforced.

Trauma encoded dependency explains why survivors can articulate the abuse clearly and still feel unable to leave. Cognition and survival wiring are operating in different systems. Knowledge does not override conditioning. The body resists separation because it has been trained to associate separation with danger or death.

This concept also explains why leaving often worsens symptoms initially. When the source of intermittent regulation is removed, the nervous system experiences withdrawal. Panic, grief, intrusive thoughts, collapse, or suicidal ideation can surface. These reactions are often misdiagnosed as proof the survivor “needs” the abuser, when in reality they reflect injury.

In Voiceless No More, trauma encoded dependency is treated as evidence of harm, not evidence of consent. A dependency created through coercive conditions cannot be used to argue that the relationship was mutual or voluntary in any meaningful sense.

Naming this mechanism is critical because it dismantles one of the most damaging myths surrounding abuse: that staying equals choosing. Trauma encoded dependency shows that staying can be the result of neurological capture, not desire.

This framework shifts responsibility back to the perpetrator who engineered the conditioning and away from the survivor whose nervous system adapted to survive.